The Quantum Accelerator

Approved in one round,
not three.

We stay with your Global Grant from first idea to final report. Most projects don’t fail — they stall, and each round of revisions costs another two or three months. We find those faults before you submit, help you find the partner who funds it, and stay on afterwards to watch the deadlines that quietly kill funded grants.

Free to every club, because we are Rotarians — this is our service project, not a business. No fee, no account, no catch. We are IT professionals who volunteer the systems side of grant work.

Anatomy of a global grant illustrative
Host sponsor
A Rotary club or district in the country of activity. Conducts the community assessment, manages implementation, receives the funds.
↑  must partner with
International sponsor
A Rotary club or district outside that country. Provides funding, technical support and guidance.
Area of focus: Water, sanitation and hygiene
Every global grant needs both sponsors. Minimum project budget US$30,000.
1,430
Global grants approved, 2024–25
US$81.0M
In program awards, 2024–25
US$30k
Minimum project budget
80%
World Fund match on District Designated Funds
US$0
What we charge. Every club, every time.
The first four figures are The Rotary Foundation's, from its Annual Report on Operations 2024–25 — they describe the programme we help you enter, not our own output. The Rotary IT Fellowship is a volunteer fellowship fiscally sponsored by The Action Group (TAG) Foundation Inc., a 501(c)(3). We are not an agency of Rotary International or The Rotary Foundation, and nothing here is a Foundation determination.

Where the time actually goes

The revision cycle is the enemy

Ask a club what took so long and they will blame the Foundation. But the Foundation reviews a complete application in about four weeks — that is the fastest link in the chain. The months disappear into rounds of revision, and into waiting for the other sponsor to reply.

Your blueprint
us, once your data is in
7 days
Community assessment
you, with our instruments
4–8 weeks
Partner & DDF commitment
district calendars, not ours
2–6 months
Foundation review
longer above US$50k World Fund
up to 4 weeks
Concept → funds received
the realistic whole
12–18 months, typical
The arithmetic that drives everything we do. A fault caught at intake costs an afternoon. The same fault caught by a grants officer costs about four weeks of review, plus two to six weeks for the club to understand the query and assemble the answer, plus another four weeks of re-review. Call it ten to fourteen weeks per round — and note that the club’s own reply time is usually longer than the Foundation’s. Take a grant from three rounds to one and you have saved five to seven months.

What we cut

Rounds. We hold your application against forty encoded rules until it is genuinely complete, run the tasks clubs run one after another in parallel instead, and time your submission to the review calendars — because missing a Trustees date by a week costs a quarter.

What we cannot cut

A community assessment needs people talking to people. A district’s funding committee meets when it meets. We design the instruments and time the asks around those calendars — we do not pretend the clock isn’t there.

The whole arc

We stay for all of it

Drafting is about five percent of a Global Grant timeline. Concept to funded runs twelve to eighteen months; implementation and reporting runs longer still. Writing the application is the part most clubs think they need help with, and the part that matters least.

Funding mechanics

What the Foundation actually matches

Move the slider. Many district websites still publish figures abolished years ago — a US$15,000 minimum World Fund award, a 100% DDF match, a 50% cash match. All three are gone. These are the current rules.

District Designated Funds World Fund match (80%) Cash contributions

The rules behind the numbers

  • US$30,000 minimum project budget; US$400,000 maximum World Fund award.
  • DDF draws an 80% World Fund match. Cash draws nothing — that match ended 1 July 2020.
  • Cash sent to the Foundation carries a 5% processing charge on top.
  • Contingency, administration and outcome measurement are each capped at 10% of budget.
  • At least 15% of contributions to a humanitarian project must originate outside the project country.
  • Applications sit at one of three review levels. Level 1 — World Fund up to US$50,000. Level 2 — US$50,001–200,000, or total funding US$100,001–400,000 involving a directed gift or endowed fund: adds an interim Cadre site visit. Level 3 — US$200,001–400,000, or total funding above US$400,000 on the same basis: adds Trustees review, an advance site visit and an audit.
  • Level 2 and 3 grants are paid in installments against a spending plan. Later payments follow a satisfactory progress report and a Cadre site visit — so plan cash flow around that, not around one lump sum.
  • Trustees review on a fixed calendar: received 1 March → reviewed June; 1 June → September or October; 1 October → January; 1 December → April.
  • Grant financing cannot be changed after approval. Get the funding mix right before you submit.
SourceAmountMatch
District Designated Funds55,00044,000
Cash contributions45,000none since 2020
Total financing available144,000

Seven areas of strategic impact

Where projects qualify — and where they quietly die

Every area of focus carries its own list of ineligible activities, and that list is where most otherwise-good applications are lost. Drag the ring or pick an area. Each card shows the mission, a project shape that works, and the specific trap.

Synthetic Grant Officer · live

Check your concept before you write a word

Fourteen of the hardest rules, running in your browser. Nothing is transmitted, stored or logged — this widget makes no network calls. Answer honestly; a blocker found here costs you an afternoon, and the same blocker found by a grants officer costs you a review cycle.

Minimum is US$30,000.
Read locally only. Never sent anywhere.

Stated plainly

What we will not do

The gap between what automation can do and what it should do is where trust lives. These are commitments, not caveats.

We will not let a model decide your eligibility.Every eligibility finding traces to a clause in the Terms and Conditions, the Guide to Global Grants or an Areas of Focus policy statement. A model's "probably fine" is not citable, and you cannot defend it to a grants officer.
We will not send automated outreach to district officers.We research the district, draft the introduction grounded in their own prior project, and prepare the brief. A named Rotarian reviews it and sends it from their own address. Rotary is a relationship network of volunteers — it is not a sequence to be automated.
We will not invent facts to fill your gaps.Missing data comes back as an explicit marker — [GAP — baseline method not supplied] — and stays there. An application containing invented baseline figures is worse than no application at all.
We will not conduct your community assessment.It requires people talking to people, and its absence is one of the four reasons the Foundation publishes for denying applications. We build your survey instrument, design the sampling, translate it and analyse the returns. You do the listening.
We will not submit on your behalf or hold your credentials.The blueprint is yours to paste into the Grant Center under your own login. Your grant, your sponsors, your accountability.
We will not charge you, now or later.There is no fee, no premium tier and no point at which this becomes paid. We are a Rotary Fellowship of IT professionals doing a service project. The cost to you is the volunteer time of your own members, which is the only currency this runs on.
We will not keep your project data longer than we need it.Intake material is used to produce your dossier and retained for twelve months so we can support revisions, then deleted. It is never sold, never used to train a public model, and never shared with a third party without your written consent. Ask us to delete it sooner and we will.

Forms and templates

Everything you have to fill in, in one place

Chasing a missing attachment is how a fortnight disappears. The intake form captures every field a Global Grant needs in one pass, and the five templates below are the attachments that trigger most revision rounds. Free, yours to keep, no account needed — use them with us or without us.

Bring us a concept. We will stay to the final report.

Start the intake form, or send a voice note on WhatsApp if that is easier. No fee, no account, no obligation — and if your project belongs in a district grant instead, we will tell you that in the first ten minutes.

Start — it’s free → info@rofit.org